Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
About Deviant Premium Member RobotMale/United Kingdom Groups :icondazaholics: DAZaholics
Recent Activity
Deviant for 5 Years
12 Month Premium Membership
Statistics 1,423 Deviations 4,807 Comments 102,719 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Random Favourites

Who has the rights to the land? 

20 deviants said Whoever has the biggest army.
13 deviants said A people who were originally there.
7 deviants said A people who came along afterwards who live there now.

Journal History

100,000 page views.
Pretty good in absolute terms. By Deviant Arts standards considering the number of pictures and the time, quite mediocre.

A dilema I have sometimes thought about is, is popularity a sign of good art? Typically are the Beatles greater than Beethoven? You can examine this by the two extremes. Amongst the most popular television programs are the Soaps. If popularity really was the measure of greatness, then the soaps represent the best TV shows there are? I think soaps are crap. Whereas in an epic you get a person rising to the challenge of facing great adversity, in a soap you get people facing quite ordinary problems managing to mess up their own lives through being thoroughly inadequate. I don't see the drama. Why would the viewer care if these miserable characters survive or not? I spend my time hoping that extra-terrestials will visit soap city and hoover the pathetic inhabitants into outer space. Now that would be a good episode. Maybe the problem is that the majority of people are stupid and like stupid things?

OK if absolute numbers dont guarantee great art are the views of a narrow elite better? Well if you consider the Tate bricks, Tracy Ermins unmade bed or a light switching on and off every 15 seconds presented as 'Concept Art' then that does not work either. This modern art has captured the art world clique whilst being regarded as rubbish by the general population. My feelings with art like this is its a massive con-trick. So narrow elitist art is not a good measure either.

So what we have from this is that neither popularity or appealing to elites necessarily means good art. On the other hand lets not be naive. A picture which many people like is still more likely to be good than one which no-one likes. So I don't have a clear answer on what make greats art. Maybe its a utility function of both popularity and the education of the audience? Or maybe I'm just trying to rig the argument so Beethoven wins? Fortunately an amateur artist has no requirement to meet the demands of third parties and can do anything he wants. Just as well really.


Add a Comment:
deskridge Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2014   Digital Artist
Thanks for the :+fav:!
amipal Featured By Owner Jul 6, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks for the :+fav:! Much appreciated! :)
JIMCAREYPHOTOGRAPHY Featured By Owner Jul 1, 2014  Professional Photographer
thank you very much fr appreciating and supporting my work!
Roboman28 Featured By Owner Jul 1, 2014
Corinne had a very classical pose. Nice.
tarstarkas Featured By Owner Jun 27, 2014
Thanks for the fave.  If you have time, please read the story, and "Woman of the Skin" which is the first installment.  :) (Smile)
Add a Comment: